Cases 71 - 80 of 426
Bara v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00804
Petitioner:
Gilbert M. Bara
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 3:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Moises Garcia, Jr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00741
Petitioner:
Billy Joe King
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saunders v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00723
Petitioner:
Germaine Saunders
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ogden v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00619
Petitioner:
Ray Ogden
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00518
Petitioner:
Markus A. Green
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Aaron Evans
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leslie v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00504
Petitioner:
Antonio L. Leslie
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swisher v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00451
Petitioner:
Bryan Lacy Swisher
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lujan, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Roberto Lujan, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
