Cases 1 - 10 of 640
Kindred v. Texas Parole Board et al
as 6:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Texas Parole Board, Temple, Texas Parole Office, Field Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Isaac Cardenas
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herrera v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Carlos Herrera
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
