Cases 1 - 10 of 1,162
Blake v. Rosalez
as 5:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
Robert Timothy Blake
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Laurel v. Warden S. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Daniel Laurel
Respondent:
Warden S. Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LaGaite v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Luis Santos LaGaite
Defendant:
Senior Warden Gene Miller, Asst. Warden Annette Marquez, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Andrews et al
as 5:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Warden Terry Andrews, Technician Buluti, Nurse Practician Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00408
Petitioner:
Gatlin Gary Morgan
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chavez v. Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McBride v. Enge
as 1:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Warden Jamadre L. Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudluff v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Steven Rudluff
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
