Miller Act Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 91 - 100 of 332
Builder Services Group, Inc. v. American Zurich Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv00964
Plaintiff: Builder Services Group, Inc.
Defendant: American Zurich Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
On behalf of the United States of America For the use and benefit of CENTURION SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC v. HLS CONSTRUCTION INC. et al
as 4:2017cv00088
Plaintiff: On behalf of the United States of America For the use and benefit of CENTURION SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC
Defendant: HLS CONSTRUCTION INC. and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of E.G. Middleton, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00331
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of E.G. Middleton, Inc.
Defendant: Cherry Hill Construction, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of TEAMCRAFT ROOFING, INC. et al v. DPR Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00300
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of TEAMCRAFT ROOFING, INC. and TEAMCRAFT ROOFING, INC.
Defendant: DPR Construction, Inc. , Whitesell-Green, Inc. , Continental Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Crenshaw Plumbing Company, LLC v. Leebcor Services, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00006
Defendant: Leebcor Services, LLC and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Crenshaw Plumbing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The Lane Construction Corporation d/b/a Virginia Paving Company et al v. Heard Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00515
Plaintiff: The Lane Construction Corporation d/b/a Virginia Paving Company and The Lane Construction Corporation
Defendant: Heard Construction, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANIES v. CENTURION SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00037
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANIES
Defendant: CENTURION SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, HLS CONSTRUCTION, INC. and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of WARWICK PLUMBING & HEATING CORPORATION v. CENTURION SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00034
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of WARWICK PLUMBING & HEATING CORPORATION
Defendant: CENTURION SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, HLS CONSTRUCTION, INC. and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use of A.C. Dellovade, Inc. v. Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use of A.C. Dellovade, Inc.
Defendant: Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc. , Ttec-Tesoro Joint Venture , Tetra Tech, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc.
Counter_defendant: The United States of America for the Use of A.C. Dellovade, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
USA for the use and benefit of SMITH & KEENE ELECTRICAL SERVICE, INC. v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 2:2017cv00116
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of SMITH & KEENE ELECTRICAL SERVICE, INC.
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company and Sauer Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?