Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Csoka et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv00876
Plaintiff:
John Csoka and Judith Csoka
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Wegman v. Mashey et al
as 1:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Wegman
Defendant:
John R. Mashey and John Doe
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Yasmin Said
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
A1 Procurement, LLC. et al v. Thermcor, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
A1 Procurement, LLC. and United States of America
Defendant:
Thermcor, Inc. , Walter L. Dixon , William M. Bolean and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-8
as 1:2014cv00811
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and FS-ISAC, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Consumer Source Holdings, Inc. v. Does 1 - 24
as 1:2013cv01512
Plaintiff:
Consumer Source Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 24
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Norman v. Patnetlli et al
as 3:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Defendant:
Rhoda Patnetlli, Boneca Norman, Annie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams v. Jaffe
as 3:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Leonard Jaffe, Stephen A. Wells and John Doe
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Fairfax County School Board v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv01480
Plaintiff:
Fairfax County School Board
Defendant:
John Doe and Cary Wiedemann
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Richardson v. William Sneider and Associates, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Victoria Richardson
Defendant:
William Sneider and Associates, LLC, Jane Roe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Microsoft Corporation v. Piatti et al
as 1:2011cv01017
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
