Cases 11 - 20 of 4,179
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Audio Pod IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Audio Pod IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC, Audible, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Audio Pod IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Audio Pod IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC and Amazon Web Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Beyond, Inc. v. Landmark Furniture, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Beyond, Inc. d/b/a Overstock
Defendant:
Landmark Furniture, Inc. d/b/a Overstock Furniture
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Luma v. Dib Funding Inc, & Sunshine Capital, Inc
as 1:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Honson Luma
Defendant:
Dib Funding Inc, & Sunshine Capital, Inc
Petitioner:
Adam Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Strike3 Holdings,LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Strike3 Holdings,LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
