Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Gonzales v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Widmer v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Amber Nichol Widmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Widmer v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Amber Nichol Widmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Riggins v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Molly C. Riggins
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunbar v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01557
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Brittany Dunbar
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Parrish v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Melinda A. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Richardson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00617
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Amani Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00596
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gina S. Owens
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dunn v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
O'Connor v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Mercede A. O'Connor
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
