Cases 91 - 100 of 682
Leavel v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00073
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Leavel
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Companion v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00036
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Laurel A. Companion
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hardy v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00024
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Hardy
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hoy v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00070
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jo Ella Hoy
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Seay v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00035
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Jane C. Seay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00066
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Angela K. Martin
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meade v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00067
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Janet M. Meade
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Akers v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Tammy W. Akers
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Salyers v. Astrue et al
as 2:2012cv00014
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wesley Salyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hairston v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00281
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Donna Renae Hairston
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
