Cases 91 - 100 of 316
Doe v. The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 2:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1
Defendant:
The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and LDS Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'Lexey v. Washington State US Senators Office
as 2:2017cv00289
Plaintiff:
Larry A O'Lexey
Defendant:
Washington State US Senators Office and Washington State US Senator Patty Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Levin et al v. Pacific Hide & Fur Depot
as 2:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
David M Levin and Teresa J Levin
Defendant:
Pacific Hide & Fur Depot , Kyle Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Majors v. United States
as 2:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Don Majors
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Harrington v. Harman Management Corporation
as 1:2017cv03112
Plaintiff:
Tony Harrington and Kelli Harrington
Defendant:
Harman Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED FILED IN WRONG COUNTY
as 4:2017cv05109
Plaintiff:
Tony Harrington and Kelli Harrington
Defendant:
Harman Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. JC Penney Corporation Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Thomas
Defendant:
JC Penney Corporation Inc , North Town Mall LLC , KONE Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Weitz v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Anthony Weitz
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WorkWell Consultants, LLC v. Morrow et al
as 2:2017cv00062
Defendant:
Feliciano J. Morrow, Morrow Consulting, LLC and Timothy Keane
Plaintiff:
WorkWell Consultants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McElmurry et al v. Ingebritson et al
as 2:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Edward McElmurry and Eva McElmurry
Defendant:
Russell Ingebritson, Ingebritson & Associates PA and Jane Doe Ingebritson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
