Cases 111 - 120 of 483
Kelly v. Bonneville Billing & Collections Inc
as 2:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Bonneville Billing & Collections Inc
Plaintiff:
Whitney Kelly
Thirdparty_defendant:
Jared M. Kelly
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Bonneville Billing & Collections Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adsit v. Dundrum, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Adsit
Defendant:
Dundrum LLC and Law Offices of James R Vaughan PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
River City Media, LLC et al v. Kromtech Alliance Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
River City Media LLC , Mark Ferris , Matt Ferris and others
Defendant:
Kromtech Alliance Corporation, Chris Vickery, CXO Media Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
Ragan v. United States
as 2:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Richard B Ragan
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 925
Ragan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Richard B Ragan
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Named Employee(s) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 925
Fitzpatrick v. Equifax Information Services LLC
as 2:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rosco et al v. Trans Union LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Russell D Rosco and Bonnie R Rosco
Defendant:
Trans Union LLC , Montgomery Purdue Blankinship & Austin PLLC and Shuckit & Associates PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
York v. AvanteUSA, Ltd.
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Logan York
Defendant:
AvanteUSA Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Foltz v. Accounts Receivable Incorporated
as 2:2017cv00021
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Anthony Foltz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vera v. USA
as 1:2017cv03005
Plaintiff:
Jose Vera
Defendant:
US Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
