Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roach v. Evergreen Financial Services Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00077
Defendant:
Evergreen Financial Services Inc, Jennifer Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Roach
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sleeper et al v. Rent Recover LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kristy N Sleeper and Randall J Sleeper
Defendant:
Rent Recover LLC, J Gregory Lockwood, Jane Doe Lockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ogrin v. Valentine & Kebartas Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ogrin
Defendant:
Valentine & Kebartas Inc and Kathy Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ogrin v. Evergreen Professional Recoveries Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ogrin
Defendant:
Evergreen Professional Recoveries Inc and Summer Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hoerner v. Standley and Associates LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Shannon Hoerner
Defendant:
Standley and Associates LLC and John Doe Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crosen v. Windham Professionals Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jason Crosen
Defendant:
Windham Professionals Inc, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daley v. Williams & Fudge Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ryan Daley
Defendant:
Williams & Fudge Inc, David Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
