Cases 81 - 90 of 142
Lear v. Seattle Housing Authority et al
as 2:2013cv00347
Plaintiff:
Rob Lear
Defendant:
Seattle Housing Authority , Terry Nham, Martha Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Bray v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 2:2012cv01254
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bray
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ramirez v. Chow et al
as 3:2012cv05630
Plaintiff:
Maricela Ramirez
Defendant:
Alexander Chow, Van Huyn, Mark Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimerman v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alex Zimerman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Apilado et al v. North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance
as 2:2010cv00682
Plaintiff:
Steven Apilado , LaRon Charles and Jon Russ
Defendant:
The North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
as 2:2011cv01772
Plaintiff:
Carol Tucker
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chen v. Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union
as 2:2011cv01761
Plaintiff:
Judith Chen
Defendant:
Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fielder v. Sterling Park Homeowners Association et al
as 2:2011cv01688
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fielder
Defendant:
Sterling Park Homeowners Association , Waverly Hagen , Don Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taylor v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2011cv01490
Plaintiff:
Marylin Taylor
Defendant:
John H Hamilton and Michelle H Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
