Cases 101 - 110 of 3,335
Demos v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05963
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Feldmann v. Sinclair
as 3:2023cv05796
Petitioner:
Johnathan Alexander Feldmann
Respondent:
Sinclair and Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fakih v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Abdallah Fakih
Respondent:
H. Barron and C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
Jess Richard Smith
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Andrewjeski et al
as 2:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Ronald Barton, Jr
Defendant:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Jackson
as 3:2023cv05739
Petitioner:
Robert Jesse Hill
Respondent:
Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Andrewjeski et al
as 2:2023cv01314
Petitioner:
Clayton Evan Cummings
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski, Bob Ferguson and John Joseph Samson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schmitt v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Jacob Ivan Schmitt
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cargill v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01304
Petitioner:
Quincetta Yvonne Cargill
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stover v. White
as 3:2023cv05649
Petitioner:
Shannon Wayne Stover
Respondent:
Dan White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
