Cases 71 - 80 of 3,319
Norling v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv06064
Petitioner:
Bo Glenn Norling
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05964
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05988
Petitioner:
Bryce Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clark v. Andrewjeski
as 3:2023cv06027
Petitioner:
Nicolas Aaron Clark
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halfhill v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv01630
Petitioner:
Scott Lindsay Halfhill
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tapia v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Petitioner:
Jasmin Jetta Tapia
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morisette v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv01519
Petitioner:
Christopher Morisette
Respondent:
State of Washington and Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lei v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Wobiao Lei
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Andrewjeski et al
as 3:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peter Joseph Rowe
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
