Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Moen v. Manion
as 2:2023cv01732
Petitioner:
William Moen
Respondent:
Leesa Manion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Monroe Correctional Center
as 2:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Frederick J Williams
Respondent:
Monroe Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lumpkins v. Bennett
as 3:2022cv05852
Petitioner:
William W Lumpkins
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Troyer
as 3:2022cv05639
Petitioner:
William Eugene Fields
Respondent:
Pierce County Corrections and Detention Center and Ed Troyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Pierce County Jail
as 3:2022cv05638
Petitioner:
William Eugene Fields
Respondent:
Pierce County Jail and Ed Troyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Troyer
as 3:2022cv05593
Petitioner:
William Eugene Fields
Respondent:
Pierce County of the State of Washington and Ed Troyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Sinclair
as 3:2021cv05801
Petitioner:
William Scott Smith
Respondent:
Steven Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. State of Washington
as 3:2021cv05542
Petitioner:
Michael Dale Williams
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ricardez v. Edwards et al
as 3:2021cv05526
Petitioner:
David William Ricardez
Respondent:
David Edwards and Jennifer Zorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
