Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Rodriguez v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv01890
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rodriguez
Defendant:
State of Washington, King County, City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camejo Rodriguez v. Uttecht et al
as 2:2013cv00889
Plaintiff:
Luis Camejo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Uttecht, David Lynch and Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camejo-Rodriguez v. Gilbert et al
as 2:2012cv02221
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Camejo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Margaret Gilbert, Scott Frakes, Bernard Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schefflin v. DeLano et al
as 3:2012cv05695
Plaintiff:
Philip Ira Schefflin
Defendant:
Lynne DeLano, Dennis Thaut, Thomas N Sahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barstad v. Department of Corrections State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
James Barstad
Defendant:
Department of Corrections State of Washington, Bernard E Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camejo Rodriguez v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2011cv01494
Plaintiff:
Geromino Luis Camejo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Bigelow, Sascha Schaudies, James Leaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camejo Rodriguez v. Superintendent of TRU et al
as 2:2011cv01502
Plaintiff:
Geromino Luis Camejo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Superintendent of TRU, John Doe, Al Stickney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camejo-Rodriguez v. Frakes et al
as 2:2011cv01110
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Camejo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott Frakes and William Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camejo Rodriguez v. Frakes et al
as 2:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Camejo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Kerrh Toyoda, Audry Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Grisham et al
as 2:2010cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jerardo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Timothy Grisham, Kimberly Pearson and Devon Schrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
