Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00867
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00866
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2012cv00606
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and President of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azzedine v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv05258
Plaintiff:
Faidy Azzedine
Defendant:
United States of America, Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myrland v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
David Russell Myrland
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Attorney and Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chavez v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01886
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Streit v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv01169
Plaintiff:
Nikia Timothy Streit
Defendant:
United States of America, Joanne Maida, U.S. Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phair v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
Maurice Phair
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Marshal's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2010mc00090
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
The United States of America and The State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv00538
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
