Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Travon Deautry Lee Johnson and Travon Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Leyden, Officer Officer Navarro, Snohomish county sherrif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cater v King County et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Halfred Cater
Defendant:
King County, King County Adult Corrections Department, Faauma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadus v. Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention et al
as 2:2021cv01720
Plaintiff:
Marvin Tate Broadus
Defendant:
Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, John Diaz and Head of Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Pacholke et al
as 2:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Carlos Diaz
Defendant:
Dan Pacholke, Hoffard and King County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrick v. Strong et al
as 3:2015cv05779
Plaintiff:
Donald Herrick
Defendant:
Mark Strong , Kelly Cunningham, Cathi Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrick v. Quigley et al
as 3:2015cv05016
Plaintiff:
Donald Herrick
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, John Clayton, Mark Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Strong et al
as 3:2014cv05854
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bryant Payne
Defendant:
Mark Strong, Dorian Diaz, Byron Eagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaghe v. Diaz et al
as 3:2013cv06040
Plaintiff:
Sam Donaghe
Defendant:
Wes Diaz , Daryl Weeks , Cathi Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Hernandez v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2013cv02092
Plaintiff:
Santos Diaz-Hernandez
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Brain et al
as 3:2013cv05648
Plaintiff:
William Curry, Jr
Defendant:
Alec J Brain , Darold L Weeks , Wes Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
