Cases 21 - 30 of 8,932
Mezquita Vega v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv00605
Petitioner:
Sonia L Mezquita Vega
Respondent:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lacey v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2024cv05327
Plaintiff:
Aja Deion Lacey
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Western State Hospital and Fort Steilacoom Restoration Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawn v. Clallam County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05310
Plaintiff:
Daniel WJ Hawn
Defendant:
Clallam County Jail, Brian King, Clallam County Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eytcheson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Franklin Gene Eytcheson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cline v. Arceo et al
as 3:2024cv05309
Plaintiff:
Lyric Leeyn Cline, Sr
Defendant:
Montana Arceo and Brandon Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
Tayan Jackson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowley v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00539
Petitioner:
Tayan Jackson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Navarette v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Jorge J Navarette
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner:
Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
