Cases 71 - 80 of 9,060
Rudder v. D.A.R.E America Program et al
as 3:2024cv05560
Defendant:
Elk Ridge, D.A.R.E America Program, White River School District and others
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lea Rudder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Midkiff v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05550
Petitioner:
Byron Glen Midkiff, Jr
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01017
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Colbert v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01002
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Bobby Darrell Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Backman v. Clallam County Corrections Center
as 3:2024cv05543
Plaintiff:
Jacob K Backman
Defendant:
Clallam County Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Washington
as 3:2024cv05542
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torrence v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05541
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Zackery Christopher Torrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv01007
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
D'Arius Akim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Woodward v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05540
Petitioner:
Robert Lucas Woodward
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05537
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Mark Brian Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
