Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
United States of America v. $23,460.00 in United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05169
Defendant: $23,460.00 in United States Currency, $15,540.00 in United States Currency, 2008 Dodge Ram 3500 Pickup Truck and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Trina Wheeler , Delbert Wheeler and King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Forest Products Northwest Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01533
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Forest Products Northwest Inc , Thomas S Read and Terry W Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2012cv05800
Defendant: Forest Products Northwest, Inc., Thomas S. Read and Trry W. Sanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Mustafa III et al
as 2:2012cv00921
Defendant: Bernard Amin Mustafa III, Community Cars Inc, Project Bionic and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $464,852.62, et al
as 2:2012cv00434
Defendant: $464,852.62, $57,345.37, $1,190.69 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. Ruger P90 Pistol, et al
as 3:2011cv05565
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ruger P90 Pistol, Taurus 85 Revolver, New England Firearms Shotgun Pardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. 112 Metric Tons, more or less, of Cooked, Frozen King Crab
as 2:2011cv00334
Defendant: 112 Metric Tons, more or less, of Cooked, Frozen King Crab
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Harbor Seafood, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3374
United States of America v. $289,508.74 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Suntrust Bank Account Number XXXXXX6205, held in the name of "Etegrity Proce et al
as 2:2010cv01853
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $289,508.74 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Suntrust Bank Account Number XXXXXX6205, held in the name of "Etegrity Proce, $315,817.06 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Preferred Bank Account Number XXX6516, held in the name of Anaya Trading Solution, $1,905.81 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Preferred Bank Account Number XXX6834, held in the name of Macquairie Solutions, LL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. $319,896.31 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds seized from Sun Trust Account Number XXXXXXXXX1663, held in the name of Secure Money, Inc.&qu et al
as 2:2010cv01700
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $319,896.31 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds seized from Sun Trust Account Number XXXXXXXXX1663, held in the name of Secure Money, Inc.&qu, $1,094.07 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds seized from Sun Trust Account Number XXXXXXXXX1625, held in the name of "Secure Money, Inc., $1,000.31 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds seized from Sun Trust Account NumberXXXXXXXXX1633, held in the name of "Secure Money, Inc.& and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Thomas v. Sound Inpatient Physicians Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05301
Plaintiff: Craig Thomas
Defendant: Sound Inpatient Physicians Inc and Robert A Bessler
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?