Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Winn v. Tinsley
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
James Winn
Defendant:
Boyd Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Morgan et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Lauren Ashley Morgan, Erik Barnes, Sherry Bason and others
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Lincoln Property Co. and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro and Laura Boelens
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Zachary Corradino, Samantha Reyes, Patrick Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Glinoga et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2021cv01245
Plaintiff:
Mark Glinoga, James Smith, Jennifer Stephens and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mi Koga Winn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05728
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lydia C Mi Koga Winn
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dental Commerce Corporation v. Ronald L Winn DDS PS et al
as 2:2019cv01723
Defendant:
Ronald L. Winn, DDS, PS, Ronald L. Winn, Ronald L Winn and others
Plaintiff:
Dental Commerce Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winn v. Tinsley
as 2:2018cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Winn
Defendant:
Boyd Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Winn v. Grand Jury Special Prosecutor
as 3:2013cv05551
Plaintiff:
Daniel Winn
Defendant:
Grand Jury Special Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Winn v. City of Edmonds et al
as 2:2012cv02133
Petitioner:
Daniel Winn
Respondent:
City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, CFS Contractors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winn v. US Government
as 2:2012cv00266
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Winn
Defendant:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
