Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Knutson v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv05550
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Knutson
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jorgensen et al v. The Dentists Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00474
Counter Defendant:
Jack D Jorgensen
Plaintiff:
Gary R Folkman, Gary R Folkman DDS PS, Wallace Wilkens LLC and others
Defendant:
The Dentists Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Bisson, et al v. Bank of America, et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bisson , Douglas and Suzanne Knutson , Albert Pearson and others
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Countrywide Bank FSB, BAC Home Loans Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bisson et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv01969
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Countrywide Bank, FSB, BAC Home Loans Servicing and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bisson , Douglas Knutson , Suzanne Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01967
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bisson, Douglas and Suzanne Knutson, Albert Pearson and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Countrywide Bank, FSB, BAC Home Loans Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Knutson v. Anchor Bank
as 3:2009cv05581
Plaintiff:
David Knutson
Defendant:
Anchor Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Knutson v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv01522
Plaintiff:
Peter Knutson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ayers v. Richard et al
as 3:2008cv05390
Plaintiff:
Lenier Ayers
Defendant:
Henri Richards, Leslie Sziebert, Walt Wienberg and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
