Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Good, Thomas v. Adams, Nathan et al
as 3:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Good
Defendant:
Nathan Adams , Greg Cisneros and City of Beloit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington, Danielle v. Shiyanbola, Olayinka et al
as 3:2017cv00672
Plaintiff:
Danielle Washington
Defendant:
Olayinka Shiyanbola, Jenni Regan and Adam Whitehorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. City of Madison et al
as 3:2017cv00576
Plaintiff:
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership
Defendant:
City of Madison and Matthew Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartig, Marilyn et al v. Defoe, William et al
as 3:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Hartig and The Estate of Edward V. Hartig
Defendant:
William Defoe, Joshua Novak, Adam Leask and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krenz, Kurt v. Wilson, Jeff et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kurt Krenz
Defendant:
Jeff Wilson, Ron Cramer, Daniel Bresina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schneider, Frederick v. Town of Campbell et al
as 3:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick P. Schneider
Defendant:
Town of Campbell , Andrew J. Gavrilos , Adam Breidel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson, Deirdre v. Helgerson, Adam et al
as 3:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Richardson
Defendant:
Adam Helgerson and Monroe County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvia, Philip v. Fell, Adam et al
as 3:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Philip Dominic Salvia
Defendant:
Adam Fell, Chris Weiss and David Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funmaker, Rhonda et al v. Adams County Circuit Court
as 3:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Funmaker and SF
Defendant:
Adams County Circuit Court and Adams County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris, Jeffrey v. Hasse, Adame
as 3:2013cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Harris
Defendant:
Adame Hasse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
