Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Olson, Michael, et al. v. Pierce County Jail
as 3:2020cv00136
Petitioner:
Dr. Michael Olson
Respondent:
Pierce County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hutter, Mason v. Huneke, Rick et al
as 3:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Mason L. Hutter
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriff's Department and Rick Huneke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batz, Adam v. Pierce et al
as 3:2018cv00572
Defendant:
Sgt. B. Baily, Lt. Pierce, Sgt. Matz and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Daniel Batz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, James v. Doe, John et al
as 3:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
John Doe , Shepard, Palmitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietrich, Jacob v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00862
Plaintiff:
Jacob T. Dietrich
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Kathryn R. Anderson , Michael Baenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Dwight v. Raemisch, Richard et al
as 3:2011cv00721
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Williams
Defendant:
Richard A. Raemisch , David J. Mahony , Correct Care Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, Lonnie v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Jackson
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , STEVEN CASPERSON , JUDY P. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowan v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Tally Ann Rowan
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Mike Knoll, Sandy Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowan v. Ortwerth et al
as 3:2009cv00613
Plaintiff:
Tally Ann Rowan
Defendant:
Judy Ortwerth, Pierce County Jail and Nancy Hove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowan v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00615
Plaintiff:
Tally Ann Rowan
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Nancy Hove, Jerry Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
