Cases 21 - 30 of 244
Chrastina et al v. Vandevender
as 2:2022cv00011
Defendant:
Stanley N. Vandevender and Nelson Vandevender
Plaintiff:
Layne Chrastina, Cassanera Chrastina and John Carter Deucore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horizon Telcom Inc. v. Beck et al
as 5:2022cv00137
Counter Defendant:
Horizon Telcom Inc.
Defendant:
Paul E. Beck, Tyler P. Beck and Kelly A. Beck
Counter Claimant:
Brian Corwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Downey v. New Rez, LLC
as 1:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Leslie Downey
Defendant:
New Rez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marion County Coal Resources, Inc. v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Marion County Coal Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
Albert Reynolds and Brenda Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Kennedy et al v. SWN Production Company, LLC
as 5:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Kennedy and Martha Jean Kennedy
Defendant:
SWN Production Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. SWN Production Company, LLC
as 5:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Stephen Scott and Pamela Scott
Defendant:
SWN Production Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerns et al v. NEWREZ, LLC
as 3:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Willard E. Kerns, Jr. and Teri A. Kerns
Defendant:
NEWREZ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cutlip v. Rollyson et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Donald Cutlip
Defendant:
G. Russell Rollyson, Jr. and WVTH LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erlewine v. EQT Production Company
as 5:2020cv00235
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Erlewine
Defendant:
EQT Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
James v. Fay Servicing LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Defendant:
Terra Abstract Trustee West Virginia, Inc. and Fay Servicing LLC
Plaintiff:
Virginia James
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
