Cases 1 - 5 of 5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. and BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and TEDCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
United States of America f/u/b/o Kogok Corporation v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Of America et al
as 1:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
United States of America f/u/b/o Kogok Corporation
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Of America , Federal Insurance Company , Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Ferro Products Corporation v. Massaro Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Ferro Products Corporation
Defendant:
Massaro Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. v. Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc., Western Surety Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
United States of America for the Use of North Star Foundations, Inc. et al v. Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use of North Star Foundations, Inc. and North Star Foundations, Inc.
Defendant:
Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. , Western Surety Company , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
