Cases 71 - 74 of 74
In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004md01603
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steve White, City of New York, Melinda Wittefeldt and others
Counter Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Noramco Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Varam, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner:
James R. Dugan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004cv01178
Plaintiff:
Transhorn, Ltd., Transhorn, Ltd., Transhorn, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, United Technologies Corporation, United Technologies Corporation and others
Intervenor:
Riverbay Corporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
1775 Housing Associates, 1775 Housing Associates, 1775 Housing Associates and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Elevator Capital Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
as 1:1998cv01233
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Movant:
ROY A. DAY, CARL LUNDGREN, DAVID L. WHITEHEAD and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
USA TODAY, USA TODAY, USA TODAY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
as 1:1998cv01232
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Movant:
ROY A. DAY, CARL LUNDGREN, DAVID L. WHITEHEAD and others
Amicu:
PROJECT TO PROMOTE COMPETITION & INNOVATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE
Intervenor:
ROBERT E. LITAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
