Cases 1 - 10 of 156,001
Tasty Burger Corporation v. Synergy Adjusting et al
as 1:2024cv11213
Plaintiff:
Tasty Burger Corporation
Defendant:
Synergy Adjusting, Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Alvarez v. Mullen Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2024cv30063
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Alvarez
Defendant:
Mullen Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Fogleman et al v. Cynosure Beautiful Energy
as 1:2024cv11224
Plaintiff:
Trent Fogleman and Cosmetic Surgery Center
Defendant:
Cynosure Beautiful Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
High Expectations LLC v. KPCA Northwestern Presbyterian Theological Seminary
as 1:2024cv11225
Plaintiff:
High Expectations LLC
Defendant:
KPCA Northwestern Presbyterian Theological Seminary
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548 Unfair and Deceptive Trade Acts
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC v. City of Cambridge et al
as 1:2024cv11220
Plaintiff:
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
City of Cambridge and 0.247 Acres of Land in Lincoln, MA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Peduto v. UTGR, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11211
Plaintiff:
Edward Peduto
Defendant:
UTGR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Potts v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company LLC
as 1:2024cv11214
Plaintiff:
Candita Potts
Defendant:
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Linker v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11222
Plaintiff:
Wayne Linker
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawson v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11217
Plaintiff:
Carla Dawson
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
