Cases 31 - 40 of 248
CAICEDO v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2022cv02431
Plaintiff:
RONNY R. CAICEDO
Defendant:
WELLPATH, GOODWIN, COKOLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARRARA et al v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2022cv02056
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARRARA and MICHAEL DOTRO
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY, STEPHEN SWEENEY, CRAIG COUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRUZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTA v. RUSSO et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
GIBSON SANTA
Defendant:
MICHAEL RUSSO, HELMSLEY, MD and BERGEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BARRY KING
Defendant:
DENISE RODRIGUEZ, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE and STEPHANY MCGANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
RONALD ERNEST KEENAN HILL
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLISON v. BRIGANTI
as 2:2021cv20169
Plaintiff:
DION ELLISON
Defendant:
OFC. BRIGANTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IACONE v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv17187
Plaintiff:
KENNETH V. IACONE, SR.
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, NORTHERN STATE PRISON MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, ADMINISTRATIONS DEPARTMENT OF NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2021cv15045
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Defendant:
LT. TAYLOR, SGT. MATOS, DOCTOR MICHAEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZELAYA v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2021cv14956
Plaintiff:
RAMON ZELAYA
Defendant:
DIRECTOR ALFARO ORTIZ, SGT. MATOS, SGT. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
