Cases 101 - 110 of 309
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv01788
Defendant:
Ivor J. Evans, Scott D Rued, Chad M. Utrup and others
Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2017cv01768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2017cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2017cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Novak v. Cornerstone Education Loan Services et al
as 2:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
Kevin Novak
Defendant:
Cornerstone Education Loan Services and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Harris v. Student Assistance Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01527
Defendant:
Student Assistance Corporation and John Does
Plaintiff:
Alanta Harris
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Stoller et al v. Walworth County et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2017cv01349
Plaintiff:
Michael Stoller and Christopher Stoller
Defendant:
Walworth County, Valerie Etzel, Randy Timms and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.