Cases 101 - 110 of 250
Gabriela Escobedo-Marquez, et al v. William P. Barr
as 19-1025
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
GABRIELA ESCOBEDO-MARQUEZ and DIANA J. SANCHEZ-ESCOBEDO
Ahmed v. Barr
as 19-3
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Farid Ahmed
Bagale v. Barr
as 19-5
Petitioner:
Dilli Ram Bagale
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Wei v. Barr
as 19-6
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Qiang Wei
Lulea v. Barr
as 19-2
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Puiu Vali Lulea
Diallo v. Barr
as 19-7
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mariama Dioulde Diallo
Gonzalez-Polanco v. Barr
as 19-30
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Maria Fernanda Gonzalez-Polanco and Christopher Mauricio Orellana-Gonzalez
Roldan v. Barr
as 19-12
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jorge R. Roldan
Feng v. Barr
as 19-42
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xuexia Feng
Carrera v. Barr
as 19-74
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mauricio Carrera
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
