Cases 11 - 20 of 719
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05509
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Detria Matthews
Earls et al v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05507
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Earls, John Giordano, Mauricio Rodriguez and others
Koffski et al v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05508
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Koffski, Joseph Ramirez, Edward Grunauer and others
Cottini et al v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05506
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cottini and Mary Cottini
Polk County v. 3M Company et al
as FLM/8:24-cv-01475
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, f/k/a United Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Polk County
Maryland Office of Peoples Counsel, et al v. FERC
as 24-2118
Petitioner:
MARYLAND OFFICE OF PEOPLES COUNSEL, AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER INC, DELAWARE DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Karith Martin v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03459
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Karith Martin
James Lafountain v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03460
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Lafountain
Paul Edwards v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03463
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Edwards
Sylvester Anghuy and Brou Bra Komoe v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03443
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Anghuy and Brou Bra Komoe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
