Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Grynberg et al v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2016cv02628
Plaintiff:
Jack J. Grynberg and Grynberg Petroleum Company
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Turki v. Department of Justice
as 1:2014cv00802
Plaintiff:
Homaidan Al-Turki
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kadell v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Roger Jay Kadell
Defendant:
Department of Justice and F.B.I.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Espinoza v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2012cv03272
Plaintiff:
Eppie Espinoza
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2210 Indeminification & Limitation of Liability-Financial
Gagan v. U.S.Department of Justice
as 1:2011cv03062
Plaintiff:
Cary Gagan
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
United States Department of Justice v. Colorado Board of Pharmacy
as 1:2010cv01116
Petitioner:
United States Department of Justice
Respondent:
Colorado Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Kriston et al v. USA et al
as 1:2009cv00909
Plaintiff:
Zachary Kriston, American Royalty Crusade, Kings Court Command, LLC and others
Defendant:
USA, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. District Court of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hopes v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2007mc00049
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Hopes, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Madison and others
Hopes v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2007mc00023
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Hopes, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
