Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Bailey v. Eugene Lusega/DDBUS LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Marshall T. Bailey
Defendant:
Eugene Lusega/DDBUS LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust, Ocwen Loan Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MARSHALL v. NELNET et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
NELNET, EXPERIAN and EQUIFAX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MARSHALL v. CAPITAL ACCOUNTS et al
as 5:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARESHALL and KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, EXPERIAN and EQUIFAX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MARSHALL v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL et al
as 5:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARESHALL and KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, TRANSUNION and EXPERIAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ascentium Capital LLC v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv04612
Defendant:
Marshall Lebarron Green Individually and also known as Matthew Clower also known as Peter Carroll also known as Michael P. Carroll doing business as Carroll Management Group, LLC, Temarque Brown, John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Ascentium Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
