Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Damian et al v. Montgomery County Bankshares, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04472
Plaintiff:
Melanie E. Damian , PFG, LLC , Montgomery Asset Management, LLC and others
Defendant:
Montgomery County Bankshares, Inc., Trae D. Dorough, Charles T. Clements and others
MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. National Products, Ltd.
as 1:2012cv00534
Plaintiff:
MGA Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
National Products, Ltd. and Playmind, Ltd.
Movant:
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. , Michael Peterson and Andrew Rudd
MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. National Products, Ltd.
as 1:2012mi00013
Plaintiff:
MGA Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
National Products, Ltd. and Playmind, Ltd.
Movant:
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. , Michael Peterson and Andrew Rudd
Chicago H&S Hotel Property, LLC v. Falor et al
as 1:2010mi00204
Plaintiff:
Chicago H&S Hotel Property, LLC
Defendant:
Chris Falor, Robert Falor, Guy Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Seaman v. Peterson
as 5:2010cv00462
Petitioner:
Pandita Charm-Joy Seaman
Respondent:
Johh Kennedy Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Wigington et al
as 1:2009cv03056
Plaintiff:
Johnah Peterson
Defendant:
Jeff Wigington, Rockdale County Jail, Conyers Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Peterson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02187
Plaintiff:
Robin H. Peterson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Peterson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
Robert Peterson and Robert Peterson
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Infinite Energy, Inc. v. Chang
as 1:2008cv02945
Plaintiff:
Infinite Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
Thai Heng "Hank" Chang
Movant:
Fernando De Aguero, Fernando De Aguero, Fernando De Aguero and others
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
