Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Burns
as 1:2018cv06257
Defendant:
Mark E Burns
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Davis v. Zucker, MD, JD et al
as 1:2018cv03211
Defendant:
Lee Burns, Howard A. Zucker, MD, JD, New York State of Health Bureau of EMS and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burns v. Cambridge, Huxley & Associates
as 1:2017mc00030
Plaintiff:
Regenia Campbell Burns
Defendant:
Cambridge, Huxley & Associates
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Burns v. Walter C. Anderson, et al.
as 1:2016mc00479
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Burns
Defendant:
Walter C. Anderson, et al.
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
The Technology Opportunity Group, Ltd. v. Burns et al
as 7:2016cv09576
Defendant:
Kathleen Burns , Richard M. Boudria , The Georges Group of New Jersey, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The Technology Opportunity Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Xerox Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv08260
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Defendant:
Xerox Corporation, Ursula M. Burns, Luca Maestri and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tarrant et al v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04427
Defendant:
Marc Assa, Michael Burns, Frank Damiani and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Miller and Patrick Tarrant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
