Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Tulalip Tribes v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
as 13-35773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TULALIP TRIBES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Real-party-in-interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SWINOMISH TRIBAL COMMUNITY, JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE and others
USA, et al v. State of Washington
as 13-35519
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE, STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
USA, et al v. State of Washington
as 13-35474
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
United States of America v. Goodridge, Jr et al
as 2:2012mc00079
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Goodridge, Jr
Garnishee:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
United States of America v. Goodridge, Sr et al
as 2:2012mc00080
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Goodridge, Sr
Garnishee:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
United States of America v. Schroedl et al
as 2:2012mc00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sara L. Milliron Schroedl
Garnishee:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. Pilchuck Group II , L.L.C.
as 2:2010cv00995
Plaintiff:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
Defendant:
Pilchuck Group II , L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians et al v. Nelson et al
as 2:2010cv00327
Plaintiff:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
Defendant:
David Larry Nelson, Michele Esparza Nelson, Nathan Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Re: Treaty Tribes' Request for Dispute Resolution Re: Request for Intervention and Coverage in Settlement Agreement
as 2:1989sp00306
Plaintiff:
Squaxin Island Tribe, Squaxin Island Tribe, Squaxin Island Tribe and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Puget Sound Shellfish Growers, Taylor United Inc, Olympia Oyster Co and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
