Cases 31 - 40 of 56
W., et al v W., et al
as 5:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
London W. and Shawn Daniels
Defendant:
James W., II , Vista Psychological & Counseling Centre, LLC , Sarah Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Zuchowski v. Harvest Credit Management VII, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01130
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. Zuchowski
Defendant:
Harvest Credit Management VII, LLC, Greene & Cooper, LLP and Jeffrey R. Krismer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kovach v. Access Midstream Partners, L.P. et al
as 5:2015cv00616
Plaintiff:
Linda Kovach , Gary L. Teeter , Sarah A. Heilman and others
Defendant:
Access Midstream Partners, L.P. and Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minnich v. Barron, Gibson & Phillips
as 1:2014cv02352
Plaintiff:
Sarah Minnich
Defendant:
Barron, Gibson & Phillips
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Idelle Labs, LTD v. Cooper et al
as 1:2013mc00066
Movant:
Victory Wholesale Grocers
Plaintiff:
Idelle Labs, LTD
Defendant:
Chaya Cooper, Sarah Golden, Dina Wein Reis and others
Moore v. The Law Office of Daniel Slane, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01101
Plaintiff:
Sarah Moore
Defendant:
The Law Office of Daniel Slane, LLC, Daniel Slane, Esq., Personally and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
