Cases 31 - 40 of 116
David Thompson Boyd v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv08599
Respondent:
Dean Borders and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
David Thompson Boyd
Erik Russell v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv02380
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Warden of Ironwood State Prison
Petitioner:
Erik Russell
Aubrey Spencer v. Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv08534
Respondent:
Dean Borders and Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Aubrey Spencer
Joseph Grimes v. Munoz et al
as 5:2017cv02314
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Institution for Men, M. Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grimes
Rickey Evans v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv08283
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, A. Days, A. Days and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Evans
Antorinette Jackson v. State of California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv02312
Defendant:
DOES, State of California Department of Corrections and Frank Truong, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Antorinette Jackson
Kenneth Mills v. California Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv07901
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Mills
Michael Urias v. Secretary of the California Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv07688
Respondent:
Secretary of the California Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Michael Urias
Kenneth Wayne Mills v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 2:2017cv06748
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Mills
Roscoe Bradley v. State of California et al
as 2:2017cv06738
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Bradley
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Figuroa House, Health Right 360 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
