Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Murphy v. Internal Revenue Services
as 1:2008cv03143
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Murphy
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pragovich v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2008mc00012
Petitioner:
George K. Pragovich
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Joseph Conroy and Sam Anderson
Pragovich v. Conroy et al
as 4:2008mc04017
Petitioner:
George K Pragovich
Respondent:
Joseph Conroy, Sam Anderson and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bank of O'Fallon v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
Bank of O'Fallon
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Kennedy Russell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Wooley v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2007cv05406
Plaintiff:
Brent Wooley
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Henry v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2007cv04814
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
United States Of America, Internal Revenue Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Khan et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv02570
Plaintiff:
Shahid R Khan, Shahid R Khan, Ann C Khan and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kozacky & Weitzel, P.C. v. United States of America, Department of the Treasurey - Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2007cv02246
Plaintiff:
Kozacky & Weitzel, P.C. and Kozacky & Weitzel, P.C.
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Treasurey - Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
