Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 31 - 40 of 285
Jane Doe v. David Guillod
as 2:2022mc00105
Jane Doe v. David Guillod
as 2:2022mc00103
Jane Doe v. David Guillod
as 2:2022mc00104
Craig Cunningham v. The Litigation Practices Group, PC et al
as 2:2022cv02423
Plaintiff: Craig Cunningham
Defendant: The Litigation Practices Group, PC, Daniel S. March, United Debt Consultants, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe v. MindGeek USA Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01015
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: MindGeek USA Incorporated, MindGeek S.a.r.l., MG Freesites, Ltd. (d/b/a Pornhub) and others
Jane Doe v. MindGeek USA Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01016
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: MindGeek USA Incorporated, MindGeek S.A.R.L., MG Freesites, Ltd. (d/b/a Pornhub) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe et al v. Bonta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Defendant: Rob Bonta and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Brikman et al v. Yehoshua et al
as 3:2021mc80272
Plaintiff: Mayer Chaim Brikman, Rivkah Brikman and Joseph B. Wolhendler
Defendant: Hecht S. Yehoshua, John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Petitioner: Twitter Inc.
Tony Le et al v. Franchise Tax Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08119
Plaintiff: Tony Le and Tam Minh Le
Defendant: Franchise Tax Board, DEA, Dept. of Homeland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
James Wall et al v. Arkansas Travel Aires et al
as 2:2021cv05889
Plaintiff: James Wall, Dave Fynan, Thomas Knopf and others
Defendant: Arkansas Travel Aires, Oklahoma Title Revival, Anne Louise Foletta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?