Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Tennenbaum v. Gamble, Jr. et al
as 1:2018cv00967
Plaintiff:
Ruth Tennenbaum
Defendant:
John W. Gamble, Jr., Joseph M. Loughran, III, Rodolfo O. Ploder and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Weyl et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00802
Plaintiff:
Nancy A.K. Weyl , John Weyl and Erste-Sparinvest Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H.
Defendant:
Richard Smith, John J. Kelley, III, David Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
IN RE EQUIFAX, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Teamster Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan
Defendant:
John W. Gamble, Jr., Joseph M. Loughran, III, Rodolfo O. Ploder and others
Movant:
Robert L. Bax and George Assad
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Whitchurch v. Elarbee Thompson Wilson & Sapp, LLP et al
as 1:2017cv05205
Plaintiff:
Julie P. Whitchurch
Defendant:
Elarbee Thompson Wilson & Sapp, LLP, Read Gignilliant, Douglas Duerr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Teamster Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan v. Gamble et al
as 1:2017cv04402
Plaintiff:
Teamster Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan
Defendant:
John W. Gamble, Jr., Joseph M. Loughran, III, Rodolfo O. Ploder and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
COBBLE v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017mc00018
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
JEFF B SESSIONS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGIA REGIONAL MENTAL HOSPITALS COLUMBUS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
