Cases 31 - 40 of 40
IN RE STEC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 8:2009cv01304
Plaintiff:
Fred Jean, Keith Johnson, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fischer, Arman Rashtchi, Keith A Ovitt and others
Petitioner:
The Firefighters' Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust, Building Trades United Pension Pension Trust Fund and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103 I.B.E.W., STEC, Inc. Investor Group and others
Defendant:
Stec Inc, Manouch Moshayedi, Mark Moshayedi and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Raymond D Cook, J P Morgan Securities Inc, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc and others
Interested Party:
Mark Berry and Jordan Grayson
Intervenor:
West Virginia Laborers Trust Fund
National Wildlife Federation et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 3:2008cv05654
Plaintiff:
National Wildlife Federation, National Wildlife Federation, National Wildlife Federation and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Dale Hall, Carlos M. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Warren Webster Alston v. Department of Heath Commission on Rural Man Power-Nebraska et al
as 2:2008cv01378
Plaintiff:
Warren Webster Alston
Defendant:
Department of Heath Commission on Rural Man Power-Nebraska, University of Nebraska Medical Center, National Personnel Records/Military and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
In re SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 3:2008cv00856
Plaintiff:
Sammy Esses, Sammy Esses, Sammy Esses and others
Defendant:
SIRF Technology Holdings, Inc., SIRF Technology Holdings, Inc., SIRF Technology Holdings, Inc. and others
Movant:
Alex Meruelo, Alex Meruelo, Matthew Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Battle-El v. Knapp et al
as 3:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
Karal Hasani Efia Battle-El
Defendant:
Lance A. Knapp, Mary F. Hutson and Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SINGH
as 2:2007at00646
Plaintiff:
Faqir SINGH
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Dept. of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Soneji et al v. Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Secretary et al
as 3:2007cv02290
Petitioner:
Deepakkumar Himatlal Soneji and Kinnari Deepakkumar Soneji
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert Mueller, Director, US Attorney General, Alberto R. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al v. Unity Outpatient Surgery Center Inc et al
as 8:2005cv00230
Defendant:
Tam Vu Pham, Thu Ngoc Pham, Unity Outpatient Surgery Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan and others
Petitioner:
Parvin Ataby and Sonia Hanson
Counter Defendant:
Empire HealthChoice Assurance Inc, Excellus Health Plan Inc and Highmark Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
