Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv07023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona, and Nevada et al v. Jay Dee Brooksher
as 2:2009cv06826
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona, and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona, and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Saving Plan of Southern California and others
Defendant:
Jay Dee Brooksher
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sheet Metal Workers International Association v. Kevry Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv02178
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers International Association
Defendant:
Kevry Corporation and Brass Smith, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Glicks, Inc. v. NLRB
as 09-2141
Petitioner Cross-Respondent:
GLICKS, INC.
Respondent Cross-Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 33
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Curtis Hedlund Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv05917
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Savings Plan of Southern California and others
Defendant:
Curtis Hedlund Corporation and Curtis Scott Hedlund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Galicks, Inc. v. NLRB
as 09-1972
Petitioner Cross-Respondent:
GLICKS, INC.
Respondent Cross-Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 33
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Worker's Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Comfort Zone Air Conditioning & Heating Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv08375
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Local 206 Section 401[K] Plan, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Apprenticeship and Journeymen Training Fund, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Worker's Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Comfort Zone Air Conditioning & Heating Service, Inc., Corastine Robinson and Stanley Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Pullen Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv08381
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of The Sheet Metal Workers Local 273 Dues Check Off Fund, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund of Los Angeles, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Richard Jack Pullen, Robyn Jane Pullen and Pullen Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund et al v. Air Climate Systems, Inc.
as 3:2006mc00727
Plaintiff:
National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund, Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund, International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry and others
Defendant:
Air Climate Systems, Inc.
Sheet Metal Wrkrs v. NLRB
as 07-1479
Petitioner:
Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 270, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent:
Oil Capitol Sheet Metal, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
