Cases 41 - 50 of 1,733,080
Poslajko v. Gritstone bio, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
John Poslajko
Defendant:
Gritstone bio, Inc., Andrew R. Allen and Vassiliki Economides
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 3:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah and Autodesk, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Anagnost, Karen Blasing, Reid French and others
Ewing v. Premium Merchant Funding One, LLC
as 3:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Premium Merchant Funding One, LLC
Matos v. Clear Start Tax Inc
as 8:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Jessica Matos
Defendant:
Clear Start Tax Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kates v. FAT Brands Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04775
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Kates
Defendant:
FAT Brands Inc., Andrew A. Wiederhorn, Kenneth J. Kuick and others
Park v. Sonder Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04798
Plaintiff:
Tad Park
Defendant:
Sonder Holdings Inc., Francis Davidson, Sanjay Banker and others
Hood v. Drive Sally, LLC
as 2:2024cv04772
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hood
Defendant:
Drive Sally, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
K.A. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity et al
as 2:2024cv04786
Plaintiff:
K.A.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
N.L. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity et al
as 2:2024cv04788
Plaintiff:
N.L.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. L.T. et al
as 2:2024cv04791
Plaintiff:
L.T.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
