Cases 41 - 50 of 3,575
Michael PeelerIn re: Michael Peeler
as 24-11018
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL A. PEELER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
State of Florida v. Jones
as 8:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
State of Florida
Defendant:
Patrick Dwyon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 Notice of Removal-Criminal
State of Oklahoma v. HHS, et al
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY OF, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Pressley AlstonIn re: Pressley Alston
as 24-10909
Petitioner:
In re: PRESSLEY B. ALSTON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Edward OberwiseIn re: Edward Oberwise
as 24-10919
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD OBERWISE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Grady Williams, Jr.
as 24-10864
Petitioner:
In re: GRADY R. WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, et al v. Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medic, et al
as 24-10875
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION and STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
In re: Lancaster Clyde
as 24-10845
Petitioner:
In re: LANCASTER CLYDE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Daniel Shaffer
as 24-10853
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL SHAFFER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Leonardo Simpkins
as 24-10855
Petitioner:
In re: LEONARDO SIMPKINS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
