Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 167
James Butler v. Connie Horton
as 20-1239
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES BUTLER
Respondent / Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden and CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Travis Longmire v. Catherine Bauman
as 20-1092
Respondent / Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: TRAVIS SANTELL LONGMIRE
Christopher Howard v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 20-1099
Defendant / Appellee: J. NAEYAERT, RUM /SCC Member, P. HUBBLE, Prison Counselor / Dog Program Supervisor, BENNY MERCIER, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER HOWARD
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Michael Hegmann, et al
as 20-15208
Defendant / Appellee: KAY A. BAUMAN, Dr., M.D., J. MARC ROSEN, Dr., M.D., SABASTIAN, Dr., M.D., SCC psychiatrist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Bruce Anderson, et al
as 20-15216
Defendant / Appellee: LORI KARAN, Dr., KIM MARIE THORNBORN, Dr., KAY A. BAUMAN, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/7:20-CV-19269
Plaintiff: BAUMAN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Bauman III v. Monsanto Company et al
as NYW/1:20-CV-00240
Plaintiff: Bauman III
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Haertel v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv13701
Plaintiff: Roberta J. Haertel
Defendant: Beaulieu, Robin Myers, Catherine Bauman and others
Shah et al v. Flat Rate Movers Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01204
Defendant: Flat Rate Elite Services, Inc., Flat Rate Movers Ltd. and Flat Rate Moving, LLC
Plaintiff: Adam Bauman and Abbas A. Shah
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 14706
Rayshon Braggs v. Catherine Bauman
as 19-2419
Respondent / Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYSHON D. BRAGGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?