Cases 51 - 60 of 116
Seavon Pierce v. Scott Mc Ewen et al
as 2:2012cv08240
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Scott Mc Ewen, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
-JEM Richard Kleinhammer v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2008cv03843
Defendant:
Board of Prison Hearings, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Keith Dann and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Kleinhammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruce Richard Senator v. Matthew Cates
as 2:2011cv04192
Defendant:
Barber, J. Blackham, C. D. Burkhammer and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Richard Senator
Robert Morris v. T Gonzales
as 2:2011cv01081
Defendant:
Lt Berthoud, Buckley, CDCR Office of Third Level Appeals for Health Care Issues and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Billy Nabors v. T Gonzales
as 2:2011cv01075
Defendant:
Lt Berthoud, Buckley, CDCR Office of Third Level Appeals for Health Care Issues and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Nabors
Keith A Higgins v. T. Gonzales
as 2:2011cv01071
Defendant:
Lt Berthoud, CSR Buckley, CDCR Office of Third Level Appeals for Health Care Issues and others
Plaintiff:
Keith A Higgins
Leroy Walker v. T Gonzales
as 2:2011cv01079
Defendant:
Lt Berthoud, Buckley, CDCR Office of Third Level Appeals for Health Care Issues and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Walker
Lonnie Lee Epps v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2010cv08812
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Sgt Perris Campbell, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Epps
Alfred Toliver v. Board of Parole Hearings et al.
as 2:2010cv08792
Defendant:
Board of Parole Hearings, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and J. Hartley
Plaintiff:
Alfred Toliver
Robert Forte v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2010cv08529
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Robert Forte
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
