Cases 61 - 70 of 2,160
Filing Error
as 3:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Antoni Nargol and David Langton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Voss v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as OHN/1:15-cv-20006
Plaintiff:
Sharon Voss and Charles Voss
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. and others
Blackshear v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as OKW/5:15-cv-00239
Plaintiff:
Virgil Alen Blackshear
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Nelda Holston et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-01122
Plaintiff:
Nelda Holston and Samuel Holston
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Parry et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:11-cv-20290
Plaintiff:
Mary Parry and Robert David Parry
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson International, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Miller et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as OKW/5:15-cv-00163
Plaintiff:
Charles F Miller and Sherree Miller
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , Depuy International LTD and others
Clark v. DePuy Inc et al
as INN/3:15-cv-00038
Plaintiff:
William T Clark
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc , Johnson and Johnson and others
Baker et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as GAN/4:15-cv-00015
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Baker and Linda Baker
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson International , DePuy, Inc. and others
Hudnall v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as INN/3:15-cv-00023
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Hudnall
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
DEIBERT et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:15-cv-00313
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEIBERT and DEBORAH DEIBERT
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
